.jpg?20250430')
Jannik Sinner’s recent doping case has sparked heated debate across the tennis world. On one side, supporters argue that the three-month suspension he accepted was unnecessary – after all, both the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) found that he had no intent to cheat, no negligence on his part was proven, and the minuscule amount of the banned substance in his system conferred no performance-enhancing benefit. On the other side, critics claim Sinner received preferential treatment, with his relatively light punishment appearing suspiciously convenient, given that it aligns with a period in the calendar where he will not miss any Grand Slam tournaments.
To break this case down, let’s first examine the basic facts. Sinner tested positive for a banned substance in an out-of-competition test, a result that was traced back to a wound-healing cream that Sinner’s physio had inadvertently massaged into him due to a cut he was treating on his finger. There was no suggestion of intentional doping, and experts have pointed out that the quantity detected was so minute that it would have had zero impact on his performance. Given this, many argue that his suspension, however short, sets a troubling precedent, punishing an athlete even when all available evidence supports his innocence.
The other side of the argument focuses on the process. Unlike other cases, Sinner’s punishment was reached through a negotiated agreement with WADA. His three-month suspension is considerably shorter than the standard four-year ban for doping violations, leading to accusations that he was able to leverage his status to minimise the impact on his career, accepting the suspension at a point in the season where he will not miss any of the sport’s biggest events. Compare this with Simona Halep’s case, where she was given a four-year suspension despite also arguing contamination. This has led to questions as to whether WADA applies its rules consistently.
However, there are significant differences between Sinner’s case and Halep’s. Firstly, Halep tested positive for a much larger quantity of a banned substance, and her case also involved alleged irregularities in her Athlete Biological Passport (ABP), which tracks long-term biomarkers to detect doping patterns. Sinner’s case, in contrast, did not involve any long-term abnormalities or repeated test failures, only a single incident of contamination. Additionally, Halep’s legal battle lasted over a year, filled with back-and-forth appeals and disputes over the credibility of expert witnesses. Sinner, by contrast, accepted a deal that avoided a protracted fight, and crucially, did not contest the presence of the substance but instead demonstrated that it provided no competitive advantage.
But let’s take a step back. Regardless of where you stand on Sinner’s specific case, the larger issue remains: Why are we punishing athletes for trace amounts of substances that offer no competitive advantage? The goal of anti-doping measures should be to ensure a level playing field by preventing the use of substances that provide an unfair advantage. Just because modern testing methods can detect microscopic levels of substances – amounts that are not only ineffective but also almost certainly entered an athlete’s system inadvertently – that doesn’t mean that athletes testing positive should automatically be punished. The intention behind anti-doping measures is to catch cheaters, not to ruin the reputations of clean athletes who fell victim to trace contamination.
Beyond the moral and scientific debates, what is often overlooked in these cases is the devastating impact that any suspension can have on a professional tennis player. Tennis careers are short, and a suspension, even a few months, can be enough to halt momentum, disrupt rankings, and create doubt in sponsors and fans. Halep’s case is a prime example of how a prolonged suspension can derail an entire career. Despite her appeals eventually allowing her to return to the court, after a lengthy absence from the tour she was unable to come close to recapturing her former glory and as a result sadly retired last month. In a cutthroat individual sport like tennis every match, every ranking point matters. A single year lost can mean the difference between winning a Grand Slam or fading into obscurity.
Sinner’s case should be a wake-up call. The goal of anti-doping enforcement should be fairness, but fairness does not mean rigidly punishing every trace amount of a banned substance that is detected. It means distinguishing between real performance-enhancing drug use and accidental contamination. If the system cannot recognise that difference, it is failing the athletes it is supposed to protect.
Coach’s Tip: Advantages of the open stance
In modern tennis, the open stance has become the foundation of baseline play, and for good reason. Unlike the traditional closed or neutral stance, hitting from an open stance allows for better balance, quicker recovery, and increased power.
One of the biggest advantages is court coverage. Since your body remains more square to the net, you can recover much faster after striking the ball, especially when pulled wide. This is crucial in today’s game, where speed and agility are just as important as shot-making.
The open stance also helps generate more power and spin, particularly on the forehand. By engaging the legs and rotating through the hips and torso, players can unleash explosive topspin shots without needing to step into the ball. This is why nearly every top player relies on the open stance, especially on high-paced rally shots where there’s no time to set up.
That said, while the open stance is a must-have for modern players, it’s not the only stance you should use. A neutral or closed stance is still useful for approach shots or when stepping into the court. But if you want to stay in control during fast-paced exchanges and recover quickly, mastering the open stance is essential. See you on the court!
Dan Barrie is the tennis director at Bahrain Tennis Academy and is a Racquet Sports Professionals Association elite professional. Connect with him via Instagram on @bahrain_tennis_academy.
&uuid=(email))