A federal judge again ruled yesterday that US President Donald Trump’s plan to build a White House ballroom without congressional approval was unlawful, faulting the Republican president for asserting that national security requirements demanded the project move forward.
In a 10-page order, US District Judge Richard Leon modified the wording of an injunction he issued on March 31 that had ordered construction to stop, to address Trump and federal agencies’ ‘brazen’ and ‘disingenuous’ interpretation of that earlier ruling.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a non-profit charged by Congress to help preserve historic buildings, sued the administration, asserting Trump exceeded his authority when he razed the historic White House East Wing last October and began construction of the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom, which is costing more than $400 million and being funded by corporate donors.
Leon said he was clarifying the scope of his earlier order to stop ‘above-ground construction of the planned ballroom’ but not ‘below-ground construction of national security facilities’. The judge’s original March 31 order said much of the work needed to stop but that crews could continue ‘construction necessary to ensure the safety and security of the White House’.
Trump and federal agencies then asserted in court filings that the judge’s national security exception applied to the entire project because of elements of the ballroom like missile-resistant columns and drone-proof roofing.