Bahrain, though small in size, has long been recognised as a welfare state in a broader sense. Despite the global financial pressures experienced over the past two decades, the country has continued to prioritise the well‑being of its people, and this deserves due appreciation.
Inflation, however, affects not just one individual but the entire family – father, mother and children alike. It may not hurt sectors such as international travel or entertainment, but it strikes directly at the kitchen, which is central to every household.
Recognising this, Bahrain introduced a monthly inflation allowance several years ago to provide some relief to families. While the intention was commendable, there is a practical concern associated with this allowance which, I believe, has unfortunately not received attention from our MPs – perhaps because it does not affect them directly.
At present, this allowance is paid only to the head of the family, whether husband or wife. If the beneficiary – say the husband or father – leaves Bahrain for any reason such as holiday, work or employment abroad, the allowance is stopped until his return.
This raises a fundamental question: does inflation affect only the head of the family who has temporarily left the country, and not the wife and children who continue to reside here, cooking in the same kitchen and bearing the same rising costs? If the family remains in Bahrain, the effects of inflation remain unchanged. Logically, therefore, the allowance should continue uninterrupted for those who continue to share and depend on that kitchen.
I hope this genuine and practical concern will receive the attention it deserves.
Muhammad
&uuid=(email))