.jpg?20260601')
In recent years, society has become increasingly focused on protecting children from discomfort, disappointment and failure. While care and guidance are essential, excessive mollycoddling can do more harm than good. Shielding children from life’s challenges can deprive them of the experiences that build resilience and independence.
Children naturally face difficulties as they grow. They fail tests, lose competitions, argue with friends, or struggle to reach goals. These unpleasant moments teach perseverance, responsibility and emotional strength.
Yet many parents and teachers rush to remove every obstacle. They solve problems for children, defend them from criticism and try to prevent disappointment. Although motivated by love, these actions can leave children unprepared for adult life.
Overprotected children often become dependent on adults. Instead of learning to decide for themselves, they ask others to guide them through even simple situations.
This dependence can erode confidence when they face unfamiliar challenges. In the real world, independence matters: employers and universities expect individuals to think critically, solve problems and accept responsibility.
A child who hasn’t been allowed to struggle may struggle later to meet these expectations.
Mollycoddling also weakens emotional resilience. Life is unpredictable and setbacks are inevitable. If children are always protected from failure, they may grow to expect success without effort. When they later encounter rejection or criticism, they can feel overwhelmed, anxious, or discouraged because they never learned to recover. In contrast, children who confront difficulties develop patience, determination and the ability to adapt under pressure.
Another consequence of overprotection is entitlement. Children who receive constant praise regardless of effort, or who are shielded from consequences, can form unrealistic beliefs about how the world works. Success requires discipline, hard work and accountability. When mistakes have no consequences, children may be less likely to take responsibility and more likely to blame others when things go wrong.
This is not an argument for neglect or harshness. Love, encouragement and emotional support are vital for healthy development.
The key difference is between supporting children and removing all challenges.
Adults should guide children while allowing them room to make mistakes, solve problems and face natural consequences.
These experiences teach valuable life skills and build self-reliance.
Childhood should prepare young people for adulthood, not shelter them from it.
If we continue to mollycoddle children, we risk raising a generation that is emotionally fragile, dependent and ill-equipped to handle adversity.
Instead of eliminating every difficulty, we should help children develop the skills and confidence to face challenges independently. In the long term, resilience and responsibility serve children far better than constant protection.
Maya Narayan
&uuid=(email))